Mingolla v. Mingolla
This text of 187 N.E.2d 378 (Mingolla v. Mingolla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decrees affirmed. The husband filed a libel for divorce, listing six minor children born to him and the libellee. Subsequently, the wife filed a petition for separate support listing as bom to them the six children and a seventh child bom after the filing of the libel. A motion by the wife to amend the husband’s libel by adding the seventh child was denied. The judge granted a divorce to the husband on the ground of adultery and dismissed the petition for support. The wife appealed. She contends that the judge’s rulings constitute an indirect adjudication of the illegitimacy of the seventh child. This contention is unsound. Sayles v. Sayles, 323 Mass. 66. There was no error.
The case was submitted on briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 N.E.2d 378, 345 Mass. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mingolla-v-mingolla-mass-1963.