Mingo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mingo v. State

86 So. 3d 1256, 2012 WL 1555096, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7003

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-3234

StatusPublished

This text of 86 So. 3d 1256 (Mingo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mingo v. State, 86 So. 3d 1256, 2012 WL 1555096, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PALMER, J.

Daryl Mingo appeals his conviction and sentence entered on a charge of tampering with evidence, section 918.13, Florida Statutes (2010). We find no trial error and, accordingly, affirm. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error, which [1257]*1257incorrectly states that Mingo entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge when, in fact, the matter was tried before a jury.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and EVANDER, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PALMER, J.

Daryl Mingo appeals his conviction and sentence entered on a charge of tampering with evidence, section 918.13, Florida Statutes (2010). We find no trial error and, accordingly, affirm. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error, which [1257]*1257incorrectly states that Mingo entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge when, in fact, the matter was tried before a jury.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and EVANDER, J„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 So. 3d 1256, 2012 WL 1555096, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mingo-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.