Mingo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mingo v. State

626 So. 2d 259, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10323, 1993 WL 407954

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 13, 1993

DocketNo. 91-2516

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 626 So. 2d 259 (Mingo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mingo v. State, 626 So. 2d 259, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10323, 1993 WL 407954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Affirmed. There was no error in the reading of the jury instructions, merely an error in transcribing the court reporter’s notes which was proved by clear and substantial evidence.

We have reviewed the evidence and conclude that there was evidence presented to support each of the elements of the crime of which appellant was convicted.

HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI