Mingo v. State
626 So. 2d 259, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10323, 1993 WL 407954
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1993·No. No. 91-2516·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Affirmed. There was no error in the reading of the jury instructions, merely an error in transcribing the court reporter’s notes which was proved by clear and substantial evidence.
We have reviewed the evidence and conclude that there was evidence presented to support each of the elements of the crime of which appellant was convicted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mingo v. State, 626 So. 2d 259, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10323, 1993 WL 407954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
626 So. 2d 259 (Mingo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. James
626 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)