Mingle v. Rossman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mingle v. Rossman

29 A. 46, 161 Pa. 366, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 698

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 30, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 184

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A. 46 (Mingle v. Rossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mingle v. Rossman, 29 A. 46, 161 Pa. 366, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 698 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:,

An examination of the testimony relied on by the defendants in this case has satisfied us that the learned court was right in discharging the rule to open the judgment. It is unnecessary to enter upon a detailed consideration of the testimony. It would require more time than we can command, and, in the end, it would serve no useful purpose.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:,

An examination of the testimony relied on by the defendants in this case has satisfied us that the learned court was right in discharging the rule to open the judgment. It is unnecessary to enter upon a detailed consideration of the testimony. It would require more time than we can command, and, in the end, it would serve no useful purpose.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A. 46, 161 Pa. 366, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mingle-v-rossman-pa-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack