Minges v. Thomas
This text of 258 A.D. 859 (Minges v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified by inserting therein a provision striking out from the third numbered paragraph of the complaint the words “ and fraudulently,” and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: This being in essence an action for replevin, the fraudulent character of the taking or detention in conjunction with the facts otherwise pleaded is not in this case. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in an action to recover possession of certain bonds.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 859, 16 N.Y.S.2d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minges-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1939.