Ming He v. Eric Holder, Jr.

510 F. App'x 583
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2013
Docket10-72569
StatusUnpublished

This text of 510 F. App'x 583 (Ming He v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ming He v. Eric Holder, Jr., 510 F. App'x 583 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ming Xin He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Perez-Ramirez v. Holder, 648 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Petitioner’s two detentions without physical harm do not rise to the level of past persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1020-21 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that a 3-day detention and beating did not compel a finding of past persecution). Because Petitioner did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that he failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PEREZ-RAMIREZ v. Holder
648 F.3d 953 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ming-he-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.