Minetto v. Maragliano
110 A.D.2d 890, 489 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48793
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 1985
StatusPublished
This text of 110 A.D.2d 890 (Minetto v. Maragliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Minetto v. Maragliano, 110 A.D.2d 890, 489 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
Opinion
Under the circumstances, it was a proper exercise of discretion for Special Term to conclude that the delay in service of the reply to the counterclaim was excusable and that the reply was meritorious (see, CPLR 2005; Sanders & Assoc. v Hague Dev. Corp., 100 AD2d 964). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thelma Sanders & Associates, Inc. v. Hague Development Corp.
100 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.2d 890, 489 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minetto-v-maragliano-nyappdiv-1985.