Minetto v. Maragliano
110 A.D.2d 890, 489 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48793
Opinion
Under the circumstances, it was a proper exercise of discretion for Special Term to conclude that the delay in service of the reply to the counterclaim was excusable and that the reply was meritorious (see, CPLR 2005; Sanders & Assoc. v Hague Dev. Corp., 100 AD2d 964). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minetto v. Maragliano, 110 A.D.2d 890, 489 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 890 (Minetto v. Maragliano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thelma Sanders & Associates, Inc. v. Hague Development Corp.
100 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)