Mines v. Hoffman
This text of 317 F. App'x 677 (Mines v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant’s December 29, 2008 filing is construed as a motion to reinstate the appeal. So construed, the motion is granted and the appeal is reinstated.
Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motions for reconsideration. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (sum[678]*678mary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
317 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mines-v-hoffman-ca9-2009.