Minervini v. Minervini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minervini v. Minervini

160 A.D.2d 851, 555 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D.2d 851 (Minervini v. Minervini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minervini v. Minervini, 160 A.D.2d 851, 555 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated June 18, 1971, the plaintiff husband appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), dated June 30, 1988 which, upon a ruling denying his application to modify the judgment of divorce to terminate his obligation to pay alimony, is in favor of the defendant wife and against him in the principal sum of $95,000 for arrears of alimony due, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered April 9, 1989, which, upon a ruling denying his application for similar relief, is in favor of the defendant wife and against him in the principal sum of $12,500.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We find that, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not err in concluding, in both instances, that there was no basis for a downward modification or termination of the appellant’s alimony obligation. Rubin, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated June 18, 1971, the plaintiff husband appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), dated June 30, 1988 which, upon a ruling denying his application to modify the judgment of divorce to terminate his obligation to pay alimony, is in favor of the defendant wife and against him in the principal sum of $95,000 for arrears of alimony due, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered April 9, 1989, which, upon a ruling denying his application for similar relief, is in favor of the defendant wife and against him in the principal sum of $12,500.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We find that, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not err in concluding, in both instances, that there was no basis for a downward modification or termination of the appellant’s alimony obligation. Rubin, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D.2d 851, 555 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minervini-v-minervini-nyappdiv-1990.