Minervini v. Bankunited

133 So. 3d 1243, 2014 WL 1031412, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3920
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 2014·No. No. 4D13-1011·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction that portion of the appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fiocchi v. Trainello, 566 So.2d 904, 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“[A]n appeal of an order denying subject matter jurisdiction does not come within the purview of rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i) and is a non-final non-appealable order.”). We affirm without comment the other issues raised on appeal.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

STEVENSON, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minervini v. Bankunited, 133 So. 3d 1243, 2014 WL 1031412, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3920 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

133 So. 3d 1243 (Minervini v. Bankunited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fiocchi v. Trainello
566 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)