Mineralized Rubber Co. v. Malcomson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Mineralized Rubber Co. v. Malcomson

148 N.Y.S. 1130

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 148 N.Y.S. 1130 (Mineralized Rubber Co. v. Malcomson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mineralized Rubber Co. v. Malcomson, 148 N.Y.S. 1130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The letter of the defendant asking that thereafter bills of the plaintiff should be made directly to him, and the orders signed by him personally, together with the proof given on the part of the plaintiff that the defendant agreed to become personally responsi[1131]*1131ble for the goods, and the weakness of the defendant’s explanation of these circumstances, lead to a reversal of the judgment and the ordering of a new trial. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The letter of the defendant asking that thereafter bills of the plaintiff should be made directly to him, and the orders signed by him personally, together with the proof given on the part of the plaintiff that the defendant agreed to become personally responsi[1131]*1131ble for the goods, and the weakness of the defendant’s explanation of these circumstances, lead to a reversal of the judgment and the ordering of a new trial. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 N.Y.S. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mineralized-rubber-co-v-malcomson-nyappterm-1914.