Mineral Railroad & Mining Co. v. Northumberland County Commissioners

88 A. 496, 241 Pa. 339, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 786
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 28, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 86; Appeal, No. 88·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These two appeals raise the same questions and may, therefore, be disposed of together. The complaint of the appellant is not that its lands have been assessed too high, but that others of the same relative or greater value have been assessed too low, and it is most earnestly contended that the court below should have sustained the appeals from the valuations fixed by the county commissioners as a board of revision. We have not been persuaded that either of these appeals ought to be sustained. What was said in Mineral Railroad and Mining Company v. Northumberland County Commissioners, 229 Pa. 436, fully vindicates the action of the court below.

Appeals dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mineral Railroad & Mining Co. v. Northumberland County Commissioners, 88 A. 496, 241 Pa. 339, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 786 (Pa. 1913).

88 A. 496 (Mineral Railroad & Mining Co. v. Northumberland County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barr v. Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes
86 Pa. D. & C. 598 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1953)
Phinney v. Board of Revision of Taxes & Appeals
53 A.2d 889 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Allentown's Appeals
24 A.2d 109 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Dery's Appeal
10 Pa. D. & C. 546 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)