Miner v. Stolts

City of New York Municipal Court

Miner v. Stolts

10 Misc. 778

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 778 (Miner v. Stolts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miner v. Stolts, 10 Misc. 778 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Gwria/m.

The issues framed by the pleadings were fully and fairly submitted to the jury. No relevant testimony-was excluded.

The question excluded by the trial justice, in our judgment, was properly excluded, as it in no wise had a bearing upon the issues involved.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Present: Fitzsimohs and Newbueger, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Gwria/m.

The issues framed by the pleadings were fully and fairly submitted to the jury. No relevant testimony-was excluded.

The question excluded by the trial justice, in our judgment, was properly excluded, as it in no wise had a bearing upon the issues involved.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Present: Fitzsimohs and Newbueger, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Misc. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miner-v-stolts-nynyccityct-1894.