Miner v. Pietraschke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miner v. Pietraschke

175 A.D. 967

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 967 (Miner v. Pietraschke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miner v. Pietraschke, 175 A.D. 967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that irrespective of whether the contract is a conditional sale or not, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments which were due. The evidence shows that defendant was not precluded from exercising his option to purchase; on the contrary, that the plaintiff was holding the machine for the defendant, so [968]*968that upon the payment of the balance due upon the contract the title would pass to him. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that irrespective of whether the contract is a conditional sale or not, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments which were due. The evidence shows that defendant was not precluded from exercising his option to purchase; on the contrary, that the plaintiff was holding the machine for the defendant, so [968]*968that upon the payment of the balance due upon the contract the title would pass to him. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miner-v-pietraschke-nyappdiv-1916.