Miner v. Gose

1 White & W. 32
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 9, 1880
DocketNo. 774, Op. Book No. 3, p. 423
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 32 (Miner v. Gose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miner v. Gose, 1 White & W. 32 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§73. Certiorari; requisites of petition for. An appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace being the regular method prescribed by statute for effecting a revision of errors in that tribunal, the petition for certiorari must allege a sufficient excuse for not appealing. [Mayo v. Lewis, 4 Tex. 1; Cotton v. Gammon, 4 Tex. 84; Bodman v. Harris, 20 Tex. 31.] That petitioner’s adversary had made a motion for new trial in justice’s court, and afterwards abandoned it, thereby deceiving petitioner, will not be a sufficient excuse for not appealing. A petition for certiorari should also set out the substance of the evidence adduced upon the trial before the justice, in order that the court, in granting the writ, may be enabled intelligently to determine the merit of the application. This has generally been deemed essential in our practice. [33]*33[Clark v. Hutton, 28 Tex. 123; Givens v. Blocker, 23 Tex. 633; Robinson v. Lakey, 19 Tex. 140.]

June 9, 1880.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mays v. Lewis
4 Tex. 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1849)
Hemming v. Zimmerschitte
4 Tex. 80 (Texas Supreme Court, 1849)
Bodman v. Harris
20 Tex. 31 (Texas Supreme Court, 1857)
Givens v. Blocker
23 Tex. 633 (Texas Supreme Court, 1859)
Clark v. Hutton
28 Tex. 123 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miner-v-gose-texapp-1880.