Mineola Automotive, Inc. v. Millbrook Properties, Ltd.

118 A.D.3d 680, 986 N.Y.S.2d 354

This text of 118 A.D.3d 680 (Mineola Automotive, Inc. v. Millbrook Properties, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mineola Automotive, Inc. v. Millbrook Properties, Ltd., 118 A.D.3d 680, 986 N.Y.S.2d 354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated January 31, 2013, which granted the motion of the defendants Millbrook Properties, Ltd., and LGM Equities, LLC, to disqualify its attorney.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“Whether to disqualify an attorney is a matter which lies within the sound discretion of the court” (Matter of Madris v Oliviera, 97 AD3d 823, 825 [2012]). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorney, “considering the settled principle that doubts as to the existence of a conflict of interest [681]*681must be resolved in favor of disqualification so as to avoid even the appearance of impropriety” (Seeley v Seeley, 129 AD2d 625, 627 [1987]).

Dillon, J.E, Leventhal, Sgroi and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madris v. Oliviera
97 A.D.3d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Seeley v. Seeley
129 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D.3d 680, 986 N.Y.S.2d 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mineola-automotive-inc-v-millbrook-properties-ltd-nyappdiv-2014.