Mine Inspectors

7 Pa. D. & C. 16
CourtPennsylvania Department of Justice
DecidedJune 9, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Pa. D. & C. 16 (Mine Inspectors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Department of Justice primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mine Inspectors, 7 Pa. D. & C. 16 (Pa. 1925).

Opinion

Gollmak, Dep. Att’y-Gen.,

Your favor of the 13th ult., addressed to the Attorney-General, is at hand. You ask to be advised whether the Mine Examining Board is justified in refusing to grant a certificate of qualification to an applicant for the office of mine inspector who has reached his fiftieth birthday, even though he possesses all the other qualifications required by the act.

Section 3, article xix, of the Act of June 9, 1911, P., L. 756, relating to the qualifications of bituminous mine inspectors, provides:

[17]*17“The qualifications of candidates for the office of inspector shall be certified to the Examining Board and shall be as follows:
“The candidates shall be citizens of Pennsylvania, of temperate habits, of good repute as men of personal integrity, in good physical condition and shall be between the ages of thirty and fifty years: Provided, however, That any inspector appointed under the provisions of the act of May fifteen, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-three, or under the provisions of this act, shall be eligible for reappointment, even if beyond fifty years of age, if in good physical condition.”

Section 3 of the Act of May 17,1921, P. L. 831, relating to the qualifications of anthracite mine inspectors, provides as follows: “. . . They shall be citizens of this Commonwealth and residents of the anthracite region, of temperate habits, of good repute, of personal integrity, in good physical condition and not under thirty or over fifty years of age: Provided, however, That any person who is now serving as inspector under the provisions of the act of June eighth, one thousand nine hundred and one, . . . and its amendments, shall be eligible for appointment, even if beyond fifty years of age, if in good physical condition.”

The qualifications as to age in both of these acts of assembly are the same in effect and intent, if not in language.

“When the word ‘between’ is used with reference to a period of time, bounded by two other specified periods of time, such as between two days named, the days or other periods of time named as boundaries are excluded:” Richardson v. Ford, 14 Ill. 332; Winans v. Thorpe, 87 Ill. App. 297.

“The word ‘between,’ when used in speaking of the period of time between two certain days, generally excludes the days designated as the commencement and termination of such period:” Kendall v. Kingsley, 120 Mass. 94; People v. Hornbeck, 61 N. Y. Supp. 978.

“ ‘Between,’ when properly predicable of time, is intermediate:” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 340.

The language of the Act of 1921, relating to anthracite mine inspectors, clearly intends that a candidate shall not be more than fifty years of age. “The words of the statute, if of common use, are to be taken in their natural, plain, obvious and ordinary significance:” Philadelphia & Erie R. R. Co. v. Catawissa R. R. Co., 53 Pa. 20. The ordinary acceptance of the use of the word “over” in connection with a term of years is “more than” or beyond. A man who has reached the fiftieth anniversary of his birth has lived more than or beyond fifty years and is, therefore, in the language of the act, over fifty years of age. Both of these acts of assembly were passed for the purpose of providing for the health and safety of persons employed in and about the coal mines of Pennsylvania. The legislature undoubtedly had this in mind in stating the qualifications of the candidates for this office. Under the statutes quoted, it has stated that certain qualifications are necessary to those whose duty it is by inspection to properly safeguard the health and safety of those employed in and about the mines. A certain age is a necessary requirement for a person applying for qualification as a mine inspector.

Except in the case of the provisos contained in the act, I am, therefore, of the opinion that the Examining Board cannot legally grant a certificate of qualifications to a candidate for the office of mine inspector who has reached his fiftieth birthday, even though he possesses all the other qualifications required by the acts of assembly referred to above.

From C. P. Addams, Harrisburg, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philadelphia & Erie Railroad v. Catawissa Railroad
53 Pa. 20 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)
Kendall v. Kingsley
120 Mass. 94 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)
Richardson v. Ford
14 Ill. 332 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1853)
Winans v. Thorp
87 Ill. App. 297 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
People ex rel. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Hornbeck
61 N.Y.S. 978 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Pa. D. & C. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mine-inspectors-padeptjust-1925.