Mindlin v. Sharpe
This text of 84 So. 2d 310 (Mindlin v. Sharpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of Sumter County State Bank v. Hays, 68 Fla. 473, 67 So. 109, as limited by Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co., 105 Fla. 644, 142 So. 226; B. L. E. Realty Corporation v. Shepard, 107 Fla. 380, 144 So. 880. See also First & Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank of Chippewa [311]*311Falls v. Buchholz, 220 Minn. 97, 18 N.W.2d 771; Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co., 180 Md. 133, 22 A.2d 554; Williams v. Kessler, Mo.App., 295 S.W. 482; and Beutel’s Brauman, N.I.L., 6th ed., p. 581 et seq.; Rich v. Hunter, 147 Fla. 724, 3 So.2d 393.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 So. 2d 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mindlin-v-sharpe-fla-1955.