Mindlin v. Sharpe
Opinion
The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of Sumter County State Bank v. Hays, 68 Fla. 473, 67 So. 109, as limited by Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co., 105 Fla. 644, 142 So. 226; B. L. E. Realty Corporation v. Shepard, 107 Fla. 380, 144 So. 880. See also First & Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank of Chippewa [311]*311Falls v. Buchholz, 220 Minn. 97, 18 N.W.2d 771; Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co., 180 Md. 133, 22 A.2d 554; Williams v. Kessler, Mo.App., 295 S.W. 482; and Beutel’s Brauman, N.I.L., 6th ed., p. 581 et seq.; Rich v. Hunter, 147 Fla. 724, 3 So.2d 393.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
84 So. 2d 310 (Mindlin v. Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.