Mindlin v. Sharpe

84 So. 2d 310
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 1955
StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 2d 310 (Mindlin v. Sharpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mindlin v. Sharpe, 84 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of Sumter County State Bank v. Hays, 68 Fla. 473, 67 So. 109, as limited by Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co., 105 Fla. 644, 142 So. 226; B. L. E. Realty Corporation v. Shepard, 107 Fla. 380, 144 So. 880. See also First & Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank of Chippewa [311]*311Falls v. Buchholz, 220 Minn. 97, 18 N.W.2d 771; Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co., 180 Md. 133, 22 A.2d 554; Williams v. Kessler, Mo.App., 295 S.W. 482; and Beutel’s Brauman, N.I.L., 6th ed., p. 581 et seq.; Rich v. Hunter, 147 Fla. 724, 3 So.2d 393.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co.
142 So. 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
B. L. E. Realty Corp. v. Shepard
144 So. 880 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Rich v. Hunter
3 So. 2d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co.
22 A.2d 554 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1941)
First & Lumbermen's National Bank v. Buchholz
18 N.W.2d 771 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1945)
Sumter County State Bank v. Hays
67 So. 109 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 2d 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mindlin-v-sharpe-fla-1955.