Mindlin v. Sharpe

84 So. 2d 310
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 7, 1955·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of Sumter County State Bank v. Hays, 68 Fla. 473, 67 So. 109, as limited by Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co., 105 Fla. 644, 142 So. 226; B. L. E. Realty Corporation v. Shepard, 107 Fla. 380, 144 So. 880. See also First & Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank of Chippewa [311]*311Falls v. Buchholz, 220 Minn. 97, 18 N.W.2d 771; Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co., 180 Md. 133, 22 A.2d 554; Williams v. Kessler, Mo.App., 295 S.W. 482; and Beutel’s Brauman, N.I.L., 6th ed., p. 581 et seq.; Rich v. Hunter, 147 Fla. 724, 3 So.2d 393.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mindlin v. Sharpe, 84 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1955).

84 So. 2d 310 (Mindlin v. Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co.
142 So. 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
B. L. E. Realty Corp. v. Shepard
144 So. 880 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Rich v. Hunter
3 So. 2d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Cooke v. Real Estate Trust Co.
22 A.2d 554 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1941)
First & Lumbermen's National Bank v. Buchholz
18 N.W.2d 771 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1945)
Sumter County State Bank v. Hays
67 So. 109 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)