Mindes v. Seaman

501 F.2d 175, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6793
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1974
DocketNo. 73-3947
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 501 F.2d 175 (Mindes v. Seaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mindes v. Seaman, 501 F.2d 175, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6793 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Captain Mindes sought correction of his military records, 10 U.S.C. §§ 1552, 1553, after he was twice passed over for promotion to Air Force major and was thus subject to mandatory release from active duty. On remand from this Court, Mindes v. Seaman, 5 Cir., 1971, 453 F.2d 197, the district court denied relief. We affirm.

Appellant failed to show that his not being selected for promotion was due solely to information contained about him in an Officer Effectiveness Report or that this report was factually erroneous. Absent proof of such error, ratings and promotion decisions are peculiarly within the discretion of military authority. Cf. Mindes v. Seaman, supra, at 201.

Appellant’s allegation of denial of equal protection also fails since there was no showing of discrimination in the promotion regulations at issue or in their application.

Finally, there is no merit to Mindes’ claim that he was denied due process of law because the Correction Board did not grant him a hearing and did not issue written findings of fact. Mindes specifically waived appearance at the hearing, and written findings are not required when appearance has been waived.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 F.2d 175, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mindes-v-seaman-ca5-1974.