Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Sup China, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 29, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-10312
StatusUnknown

This text of Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Sup China, Inc. (Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Sup China, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Sup China, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTEISST DRIISCTTR OICFT N CEOWU YROTR K MINDEN PICTURES, INC., Plaintiff, 23-CV-10312 (DEH) v.

SUP CHINA, INC., ORDER Defendant.

DALE E. HO, United States District Judge:

On February 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for a default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) and Local Civil Rule 55.2(b). See ECF No. 15. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file any opposition to the motion for default judgment by March 19, 2024. Defendant is cautioned that corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel, see Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), and where such an entity “repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default judgment may be entered against it,” Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). It is further ORDERED that Defendant appear and show cause before this Court on April 2, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. EST, why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against Defendant. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court’s dedicated conference line at (646) 453-4442 and using access code 669 942 829, followed by the pound (#) key. The February 20, 2024 filing of Plaintiff’s Proposed Clerk’s Certificate of Default was deemed deficient by the Clerk’s Office. See ECF No. 17. No later than March 22, 2024, Plaintiff must refile Proposed Clerk’s Certificate of Default and file the proposed default judgment order electronically, using the ECF Filing Event “Proposed Default Judgment,” for the Clerk’s approval. In the event that Defendant appears or opposes the motion for default judgment prior to that date, the parties shall prepare to treat that conference as the initial pretrial conference. That is, if Defendant appears, opposes the motion, or seeks a nunc pro tunc extension of time to respond to the complaint, then the parties — including the appearing Defendant — shall follow the pre-conference procedures specified in the Court’s Order of January 24, 2024, including by submitting a joint letter and a proposed case management plan no later than the Tuesday prior to the conference. See ECF No. 13. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff serve Defendant via overnight courier with (1) a copy of this Order by March 5, 2024; and (2) a copy of the motion for default judgment and supporting papers not already served on Defendant. In each case, Plaintiff must file proof of such service on the docket by March 5, 2025. SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 29, 2024 Lk New York, New York Le A DALE E. HO United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Company Of New York
443 F.3d 180 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Lattanzio v. Comta
481 F.3d 137 (Second Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Sup China, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minden-pictures-inc-v-sup-china-inc-nysd-2024.