Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 1, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-04069·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MINDEN PICTURES, INC., Plaintiff, No. 22-CV-4069 (RA) v. ORDER COMPLEX MEDIA, INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: On March 27, 2023, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, directing Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days provided it had a good faith basis to do so. On April 27, 2023, thirty-one days after the Court’s order, Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint. On the same day, Defendant moved to dismiss the matter with prejudice on the ground Plaintiff failed to file a Second Amended Complaint before its deadline elapsed, and Plaintiff responded to Defendant’s application on May 1, 2023. Given the “strong preference” in this Circuit “for resolving disputes on the merits,” City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 645 F.3d 114, 129 (2d Cir. 2011), and the brief length of the delay, Defendant’s instant application is denied without prejudice. Defendant may file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 1, 2023 i] New York, New York fo / / ( a Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc. (Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC
645 F.3d 114 (Second Circuit, 2011)