Minden Corp. v. Sarkas

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Minden Corp. v. Sarkas

354 A.2d 129, 116 R.I. 914, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1389

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 25, 1976·No. M. P. No. 76-82·Published

Opinion

Peti[915]*915tion for writ of certiorari is granted. The parties are directed to discuss the issue, among other issues in this case, of whether or not the fact that a licensee permits disorderly persons to congregate outside a licensed establishment, as well as permitting disorderly incidents to occur inside the establishment, is ground for the non-renewal of a license. Paolino, J. not participating.

Abedon, Stanzler, Biener, Skolnik & Lipsey, Milton Stanzler, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Forrest Avila, Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peti[915]*915tion for writ of certiorari is granted. The parties are directed to discuss the issue, among other issues in this case, of whether or not the fact that a licensee permits disorderly persons to congregate outside a licensed establishment, as well as permitting disorderly incidents to occur inside the establishment, is ground for the non-renewal of a license. Paolino, J. not participating.

Abedon, Stanzler, Biener, Skolnik & Lipsey, Milton Stanzler, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Forrest Avila, Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Minden Corp. v. Sarkas, 354 A.2d 129, 116 R.I. 914, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1389 (R.I. 1976).

Pincite

354 A.2d 129 (Minden Corp. v. Sarkas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.