Mindelsohn v. Modern Protective Ass'n

Appellate Court of Illinois

Mindelsohn v. Modern Protective Ass'n

173 Ill. App. 52, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 364

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 3, 1912

DocketGen. No. 16,803

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ill. App. 52 (Mindelsohn v. Modern Protective Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mindelsohn v. Modern Protective Ass'n, 173 Ill. App. 52, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 364 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

As in case No. 16,802, decided at this term of court, ante, p. 51 the judgment in this cause must be affirmed for the reason that plaintiff in error has the abstract of record printed with a smaller type than the type required by Rule 19, Appellate Court, First District.

Therefore, for want of a sufficient abstract of record, the judgment is affirmed.

In addition, we may say that from an examination of the record herein, we are of the opinion that even if plaintiff in error had complied with the above rule, the judgment should nevertheless be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI