Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v. Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co.
This text of Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v. Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co. (Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v. Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Infinity Property & Casualty Co., Appellant.
Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP, Yilo J. Kang, Esq., for appellant. Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C., Galina Feldsherova, Esq., for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered October 3, 2014. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, by order entered October 3, 2014, the Civil Court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
For the reasons stated in Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Infinity Group (49 Misc 3d 42 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted (see also Remedial Med. Care, P.C., as Assignee of Jermaine Lyte v Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., __ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op____ [appeal No. 2015-397 K C], decided herewith).
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 31, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v. Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mind-body-acupuncture-pc-v-infinity-prop-cas-co-nyappterm-2017.