Minck v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Minck v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

138 N.Y.S. 101

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 138 N.Y.S. 101 (Minck v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minck v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 138 N.Y.S. 101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although there has been a judgment rendered, and affirmed by the Appellant Division at variance with the judgment rendered by the trial court here, upon facts growing out of the same accident, unless we are in a position to require the trial court to reach a different conclusion than it has already reached upon conflicting evidence, this judgment should be affirmed.

As it is obvious we have no such power, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although there has been a judgment rendered, and affirmed by the Appellant Division at variance with the judgment rendered by the trial court here, upon facts growing out of the same accident, unless we are in a position to require the trial court to reach a different conclusion than it has already reached upon conflicting evidence, this judgment should be affirmed.

As it is obvious we have no such power, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 N.Y.S. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minck-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nyappterm-1912.