Minchew/Smith, Inc. D/B/A Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen v. Carment A. Kiara

Court of Appeals of Texas

Minchew/Smith, Inc. D/B/A Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen v. Carment A. Kiara

DecidedApril 9, 2010

Docket03-09-00638-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Minchew/Smith, Inc. D/B/A Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen v. Carment A. Kiara (Minchew/Smith, Inc. D/B/A Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen v. Carment A. Kiara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minchew/Smith, Inc. D/B/A Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen v. Carment A. Kiara, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00638-CV

Minchew/Smith, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen, Appellants

v.

Carment A. Kiara, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-08-001187, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Minchew/Smith, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Austin Associates and Natalie Brodersen have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. They certify that they have conferred with appellee Carment A. Kiara and that Kiara does not oppose this motion. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellants' Motion

Filed: April 9, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI