Minchew v. Saul

E.D. North Carolina

Minchew v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 27, 2021

Docket5:20-cv-00105

StatusUnknown

This text of Minchew v. Saul (Minchew v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minchew v. Saul, (E.D.N.C. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO. 5:20-CV-00105-M

PHILLIP MINCHEW, ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ORDER ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) Defendant. )

This matter is before the court on the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [DE-28]. As implied by the title of the motion, both parties have agreed to remanding this case for further administrative proceedings. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

SO ORDERED this the atts of January, 2021. Why) Veug RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO. 5:20-CV-00105-M

PHILLIP MINCHEW, ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ORDER ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) Defendant. )

This matter is before the court on the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [DE-28]. As implied by the title of the motion, both parties have agreed to remanding this case for further administrative proceedings. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

SO ORDERED this the atts of January, 2021. Why) Veug RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Minchew v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minchew-v-saul-nced-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack