Minchenko v. 855 East 7th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minchenko v. 855 East 7th Street Corp.

193 A.D.2d 591, 598 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 591 (Minchenko v. 855 East 7th Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minchenko v. 855 East 7th Street Corp., 193 A.D.2d 591, 598 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated March 5, 1991, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[592]*592Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted in support of the defendants’ motion was sufficient to warrant the granting of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068). Moreover, the papers submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise the existence of any bona fide issues of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra.). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated March 5, 1991, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[592]*592Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted in support of the defendants’ motion was sufficient to warrant the granting of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068). Moreover, the papers submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise the existence of any bona fide issues of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra.). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 591, 598 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minchenko-v-855-east-7th-street-corp-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack