Mincey v. State
This text of 86 S.E. 783 (Mincey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Prom the statement of the accused himself, there was such evidence of an assault less than a felony as authorized the verdict of voluntary manslaughter; and since, under the evidence for the State, a [337]*337verdict of murder would have been fully authorized, the exceptions to the instructions of the trial judge on the law of manslaughter are immaterial and afford the accused no ground for complaint.
2. Erom the evidence, as well as the defendant’s statement at the trial, it is clearly inferable that there was such a mutual intention to fight with deadly weapons as brings the case under the ruling in Gann v. State, 30 Ga. 67. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 783, 17 Ga. App. 336, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mincey-v-state-gactapp-1915.