Mincey v. State

683 So. 2d 1165, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13260, 1996 WL 724196
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mincey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 684 So. 2d 236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 1996·No. No. 96-3536·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm with prejudice the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, except for that portion where appellant alleges his probation was improperly revoked without being afforded counsel. As to that allegation, we affirm without prejudice to appellant’s refiling a timely and properly sworn motion. See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985).

POLEN, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mincey v. State, 683 So. 2d 1165, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13260, 1996 WL 724196 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 1165 (Mincey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
464 So. 2d 1171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)