Mince v. State

216 S.W. 869, 86 Tex. Crim. 327, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 421
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 1919·No. No. 5519.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

—Appellant appeals from a conviction in the District Court of Hale County, sitting as a Juvenile Court and rendering a judgment finding appellant guilty of being a delinquent child, and ordering him confined in the State Industrial School for Boys, at Gatesville. The judgment recites that a jury was waived, and appellant found guilty of being a delinquent child.

A motion for a new trial was made and overruled, and the case, as brought here, presents but one point, to wit: that the complaint filed against appellant shows him to be guilty of a felony, and that in a felony case a jury cannot be waived. Under our statutes, a charge against one of being a delinquent child, is not a felony, and a jury can be waived. This identical question was before this Court in the companion ease of Allen Lee v. The State, decided at a former day of this term adversely to the contention of appellant.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed^

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mince v. State, 216 S.W. 869, 86 Tex. Crim. 327, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 421 (Tex. 1919).

216 S.W. 869 (Mince v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.
168 P.2d 191 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)