Minaya v. American National Red Cross
225 A.D.2d 397, 640 N.Y.2d 9, 640 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692
Opinion
Plaintiffs own deposition testimony, that immediately before his fall he could and did observe the two-foot path directly in front of him that had to be traversed in unloading boxes from [398] a truck and putting them on a skid and saw no debris or obstructions thereon, establishes that his fall could not have been caused by any dry ice on the loading platform (see, Garcia v New York City Hous. Auth., 183 AD2d 619). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minaya v. American National Red Cross, 225 A.D.2d 397, 640 N.Y.2d 9, 640 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 397 (Minaya v. American National Red Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garcia v. New York City Housing Authority
183 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)