Minaya v. American National Red Cross

225 A.D.2d 397, 640 N.Y.2d 9, 640 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692

This text of 225 A.D.2d 397 (Minaya v. American National Red Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minaya v. American National Red Cross, 225 A.D.2d 397, 640 N.Y.2d 9, 640 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Plaintiffs own deposition testimony, that immediately before his fall he could and did observe the two-foot path directly in front of him that had to be traversed in unloading boxes from [398]*398a truck and putting them on a skid and saw no debris or obstructions thereon, establishes that his fall could not have been caused by any dry ice on the loading platform (see, Garcia v New York City Hous. Auth., 183 AD2d 619). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. New York City Housing Authority
183 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 397, 640 N.Y.2d 9, 640 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minaya-v-american-national-red-cross-nyappdiv-1996.