Minard v. Delaware, L. & W. R.
This text of 153 F. 578 (Minard v. Delaware, L. & W. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
. The specifications of error in tins case present for decision the question whether a certain clause in a deed of convey[579]*579anee referred to in the pleadings and offered in evidence on the trial should be construed as a covenant or a condition subsequent. In the Circuit Court Judge Cross (Minard v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. [C. C.] 139 Fed. 60) construed the clause as a covenant. We think the principles of law applicable to the case are correctly stated by him and we are content to rest our decision on his opinion.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 F. 578, 82 C.C.A. 586, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minard-v-delaware-l-w-r-ca3-1907.