Mina v. Mina

New York Court of Appeals

Mina v. Mina

435 N.E.2d 1090, 56 N.Y.2d 617, 450 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3288

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 6, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 435 N.E.2d 1090 (Mina v. Mina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mina v. Mina, 435 N.E.2d 1090, 56 N.Y.2d 617, 450 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3288 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

In the exercise of its discretion to deny appellant’s application for a transcript under CPLR 1102 the Appellate Division did not weigh any impermissible considerations. That court’s denial of the application did not constitute an abuse of discretion nor was it otherwise infected by error of law.

[619]*619Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI