Mina v. Mina

435 N.E.2d 1090, 56 N.Y.2d 617, 450 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3288
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

In the exercise of its discretion to deny appellant’s application for a transcript under CPLR 1102 the Appellate Division did not weigh any impermissible considerations. That court’s denial of the application did not constitute an abuse of discretion nor was it otherwise infected by error of law.

[619]*619Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mina v. Mina, 435 N.E.2d 1090, 56 N.Y.2d 617, 450 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3288 (N.Y. 1982).

435 N.E.2d 1090 (Mina v. Mina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Y.H. v. I.C.
2025 NY Slip Op 51717(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2025)