Mina De Oro, LLC v. Goettsche

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 10, 2023·No. 2:20-cv-00994·Unknown

Opinion

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Mina De Oro, LLC, and The Toy Chest, LLC, Case No. 2:20-cv-00994-CDS-VCF

Plaintiffs

v. Order Granting Motion for Default

Judgment and Closing Case Jobediah Sinclair Weeks,

[ECF No. 56] Defendant

Plaintiffs Mina De Oro, LLC and The Toy Chest, LLC move for default judgment against the sole remaining defendant, Jobediah Sinclair Weeks, who has not appeared or participated in this litigation. ECF No. 56. The plaintiffs have already obtained entry of default as to Weeks. ECF No. 53. I have reviewed the plaintiffs’ motion and their arguments about why default judgment is appropriate under the factors identified in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 (9th Cir. 1986). ECF No. 56. Despite the strong policy favoring decisions on the merits, I find that the Eitel factors ultimately weigh in favor of default judgment here. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment [ECF No. 56] is GRANTED. Because no defendants remain in this case, with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT against Weeks in the amount of $250,000 in favor of each plaintiff and CLOSE THIS CASE. DATED: April 10, 2023 _________________________________ Cristina D. Silva United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mina De Oro, LLC v. Goettsche, (D. Nev. 2023).

Mina De Oro, LLC v. Goettsche (Mina De Oro, LLC v. Goettsche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCool
782 F.2d 1470 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)