Mims v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mims v. State

778 So. 2d 540, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2435, 2001 WL 218969

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 7, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-1184

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 778 So. 2d 540 (Mims v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mims v. State, 778 So. 2d 540, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2435, 2001 WL 218969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm finding there was sufficient evidence to satisfy the trial court’s conclusion that the defendant violated his probation based upon the incidents which occurred on September 1, 1999. Since only hearsay evidence was presented at the probation violation hearing concerning the events on August 27, 1999, these findings are stricken. See Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm finding there was sufficient evidence to satisfy the trial court’s conclusion that the defendant violated his probation based upon the incidents which occurred on September 1, 1999. Since only hearsay evidence was presented at the probation violation hearing concerning the events on August 27, 1999, these findings are stricken. See Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

778 So. 2d 540, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2435, 2001 WL 218969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mims-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack