Mims v. State

167 So. 2d 46
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1964·No. No. 5115·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lyles v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1964, 329 F.2d 332; Byers v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 57; Marti v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 506, and Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 730.

SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mims v. State, 167 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

167 So. 2d 46 (Mims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marti v. State
163 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Byers v. State
163 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Austin v. State
160 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)