Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Mims v. State

Mims v. State

94 So. 926, 19 Ala. App. 689
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 1922·No. 5 Div. 418.·Published

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing liquor and he appeals. We have examined each of the exceptions taken to the introduction of evidence, and find no prejudicial error in any of the rulings of the court. There is no - error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

MERRITT. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mims v. State, 94 So. 926, 19 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

94 So. 926 (Mims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.