Mims v. J. C. Penney Co.
201 So. 2d 88, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4573
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on ap[89] peal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Grail v. Risden (Fla.App.1964), 167 So.2d 610; Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty, (Fla.1959), 109 So.2d 5; Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn (Fla.App.1959), 108 So.2d 638.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mims v. J. C. Penney Co., 201 So. 2d 88, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
201 So. 2d 88 (Mims v. J. C. Penney Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn
108 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Grall v. Risden
167 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty
109 So. 2d 5 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)