Mims v. Holder

Supreme Court of Alabama

Mims v. Holder

297 So. 2d 809, 292 Ala. 742, 1974 Ala. LEXIS 1180

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 11, 1974

DocketSC 683

StatusPublished

This text of 297 So. 2d 809 (Mims v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mims v. Holder, 297 So. 2d 809, 292 Ala. 742, 1974 Ala. LEXIS 1180 (Ala. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

COLEMAN, Justice.

On the authority of Ex parte Miller, 292 Ala. 554, 297 So.2d 802, decided this day, it is ordered that if, upon advice of this decision, the trial court does not enter an order allowing the plaintiff to amend his complaint by adding James Pearson, ABC Corporation as surety on the bond of James Pearson, and John Jackson as parties defendant, the peremptory writ to effectuate such ends will issue at the request of petitioner.

Writ awarded conditionally.

HEFLIN, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COLEMAN, Justice.

On the authority of Ex parte Miller, 292 Ala. 554, 297 So.2d 802, decided this day, it is ordered that if, upon advice of this decision, the trial court does not enter an order allowing the plaintiff to amend his complaint by adding James Pearson, ABC Corporation as surety on the bond of James Pearson, and John Jackson as parties defendant, the peremptory writ to effectuate such ends will issue at the request of petitioner.

Writ awarded conditionally.

HEFLIN, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 So. 2d 809, 292 Ala. 742, 1974 Ala. LEXIS 1180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mims-v-holder-ala-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack