Mims, Keith Leon, A/K/A Robert Leon Bridges v. Texas, the State Of

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 1995
Docket05-91-01580-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mims, Keith Leon, A/K/A Robert Leon Bridges v. Texas, the State Of (Mims, Keith Leon, A/K/A Robert Leon Bridges v. Texas, the State Of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mims, Keith Leon, A/K/A Robert Leon Bridges v. Texas, the State Of, (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed May 23, 1995

In The

(ticuri of Appeals JTtftl| Btstrtri of (Eexas at Ballas No. 05-91-01580-CR

KEITH LEON MIMS A/K/A ROBERT LEON BRIDGES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F90-11116-RW

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before Justices Baker, Chapman, and Devany

Keith Leon Mims a/k/a Robert Leon Bridges appeals his conviction for burglary of

a vehicle. Without the benefit of a plea bargain on punishment, appellant pleaded guilty

to the offense alleged in the indictment. The trial court accepted appellant's guilty plea, found the evidence substantiated his guilt, and deferred an adjudication of guilt. The trial court placed appellant on deferred adjudication probation for ten years and assessed a$500 fine.

The State filed a motion to adjudicate alleging appellant violated the terms of his probation. Appellant entered an open plea of true to the allegations in the State's motion. The trial court adjudicated appellant guilty and assessed a ten-year sentence. Appellant's attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant supported by a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The t brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no

arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se brief. Appellant did not file a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment. We grant the motion of appellant's counsel to

withdraw as appellant's attorney.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 90 911580F.U05

-2- fJs^'^>^^:'>;^4^*^#^WI^*«^yfe^rf^!!^^HSA#

Court of Appeals IFtfty itstrirt of ©exas at Sallas JUDGMENT

KEITH LEON MIMS a/k/a ROBERT Appeal from the 636rd District Court of LEON BRIDGES, Appellant Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90- 11116-RW). No 05-91-01580-CR V. Opinion delivered per curiam, before Justices Baker, Chapman, and Devany. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Judgment entered May 23, 1995.

Cff&a&j- ~-7

JAMES A. BAKER JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mims, Keith Leon, A/K/A Robert Leon Bridges v. Texas, the State Of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mims-keith-leon-aka-robert-leon-bridges-v-texas-th-texapp-1995.