Mima & Queen v. Hepburn

20 F. Cas. 130, 2 D.C. 3, 2 Cranch 3
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJune 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 F. Cas. 130 (Mima & Queen v. Hepburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mima & Queen v. Hepburn, 20 F. Cas. 130, 2 D.C. 3, 2 Cranch 3 (circtddc 1810).

Opinion

The Court

directed twelve jurors to be drawn out of the box, and a list handed to each party.

(Thruston, J., absent,)

rejected a challenge because a juror was an alien. It was .stated to have been decided early in the existence of this Court, that alienage was no cause of challenge. Four jurors were challenged for cause, and. put aside; until two were sworn, who ’tried whether the four stood indifferent.

The Court admitted a freeborn black to give evidence. There were several bills of exception taken.

Cranch, C. J., was absent during part of the trial.

Verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States. 7 Cranch, 290.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Costa
6 P.R. Fed. 376 (D. Puerto Rico, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 130, 2 D.C. 3, 2 Cranch 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mima-queen-v-hepburn-circtddc-1810.