Milward v. Hallett
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 344 (Milward v. Hallett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Every amendment must be on the case made or refer to the line and page in which it is proposed to be inserted. This, not because it is less an amendment when written on a separate piece of paper, but in order to inform the judge, before whom the cause was tried, where to direct his attention, in case the facts should be disputed, and not reduce him to the necessity of reading over and comparing two cases.
Motion denied.
See Eagle v. Abner, 1 J. 0. 332. But see Graham’s Pr., 2d ed. 332.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cai. Cas. 344, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milward-v-hallett-nysupct-1803.