Milton v. State

56 So. 3d 803, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 414, 2011 WL 198387
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Milton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 993 So. 2d 1047
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2011·No. No. 1D10-5703·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s “Motion for Delayed Appeal” has been treated by the court as a re[804]*804sponse to our order to show cause questioning the timeliness of the notice of appeal. Inasmuch as the response fails to demonstrate that the notice of appeal was timely filed, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. However, in light of the allegation that appellant timely made his desire for an appeal known to counsel and fault for the unexplained delay in filing of the notice of appeal cannot be attributed to appellant himself, this disposition is without prejudice to the filing of a properly sworn petition seeking belated appeal complying with the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milton v. State, 56 So. 3d 803, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 414, 2011 WL 198387 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

56 So. 3d 803 (Milton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.