Milton v. State ex rel. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Milton v. State ex rel. Dade County

268 So. 2d 552, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6036

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1972

DocketNo. 72-179

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 2d 552 (Milton v. State ex rel. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milton v. State ex rel. Dade County, 268 So. 2d 552, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6036 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by William Battle Milton, defendant and Resolute Insurance Company, surety, from a judgment of forfeiture of an appearance bail bond and an order denying appellants’ motion to vacate said judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida.

The record on appeal shows that appellants failed to follow the requirements of § 903.271(2) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., in that the assault upon the judgment was untimely, having been made almost six months after its entry and because the application to set aside the judgment was not accompanied by an affidavit setting forth the facts on which the application was founded. We further find that the record on appeal is insufficient to support the appellants’ contentions. State for the use and benefit of Dade County v. Moran, Fla.App. 1967, 199 So.2d 136; City of Miami Beach v. Boyden, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 429; see also: Capitol Indemnity Insurance Company v. State, Fla.1956, 86 So.2d 156.

For the reasons stated the order and judgment appealed is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by William Battle Milton, defendant and Resolute Insurance Company, surety, from a judgment of forfeiture of an appearance bail bond and an order denying appellants’ motion to vacate said judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida.

The record on appeal shows that appellants failed to follow the requirements of § 903.271(2) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., in that the assault upon the judgment was untimely, having been made almost six months after its entry and because the application to set aside the judgment was not accompanied by an affidavit setting forth the facts on which the application was founded. We further find that the record on appeal is insufficient to support the appellants’ contentions. State for the use and benefit of Dade County v. Moran, Fla.App. 1967, 199 So.2d 136; City of Miami Beach v. Boyden, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 429; see also: Capitol Indemnity Insurance Company v. State, Fla.1956, 86 So.2d 156.

For the reasons stated the order and judgment appealed is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 2d 552, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-v-state-ex-rel-dade-county-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack