Milton v. Oakland County Board of Auditors

Michigan Supreme Court

Milton v. Oakland County Board of Auditors

393 Mich. 908, 1974 Mich. LEXIS 837

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 23, 1974

DocketDocket No. 56196

StatusPublished

This text of 393 Mich. 908 (Milton v. Oakland County Board of Auditors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milton v. Oakland County Board of Auditors, 393 Mich. 908, 1974 Mich. LEXIS 837 (Mich. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

[908]*908Leave to appeal is considered and, it appearing to this Coürt that the cases of Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc (Docket No. 54825), Bahu v Chrysler Corporation (Docket No. 54879), and MacKenzie v General Motors Corporation (Docket No. 55072) are presently pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in those cases may be decisive of the issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, it is ordered that the present application be held in abeyance pending decision in Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc, Bahu v Chrysler Corporation, and MacKenzie v General Motors Corporation.

Franklin, Petrulis & Lichty, P. C, for defendants-appellees.

Reported below: 54 Mich App 429.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[908]*908Leave to appeal is considered and, it appearing to this Coürt that the cases of Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc (Docket No. 54825), Bahu v Chrysler Corporation (Docket No. 54879), and MacKenzie v General Motors Corporation (Docket No. 55072) are presently pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in those cases may be decisive of the issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, it is ordered that the present application be held in abeyance pending decision in Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc, Bahu v Chrysler Corporation, and MacKenzie v General Motors Corporation.

Franklin, Petrulis & Lichty, P. C, for defendants-appellees.

Reported below: 54 Mich App 429.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 Mich. 908, 1974 Mich. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-v-oakland-county-board-of-auditors-mich-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack