Milton v. Alameida

101 F. App'x 713
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2004·No. No. 03-57115·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

William Milton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his request to proceed in forma pauperis in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He contends that the district court erred in denying the in forma pauperis request for failure to provide a certified copy of a trust fund statement for the past six months, as required [714] by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), because prison authorities forwarded the statement to the district court multiple times. We review for an abuse of discretion. See James v. Madison Street Jail, 122 F.3d 27, 27 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam). The record shows that the district court received the required trust fund statement. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings.1

VACATED and REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milton v. Alameida, 101 F. App'x 713 (9th Cir. 2004).

101 F. App'x 713 (Milton v. Alameida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James v. Madison Street Jail
122 F.3d 27 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)