Milton Rolando Paz v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 16, 2017
• Docket: 01-15-00979-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00979-CR Style: Milton Rolando Paz v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: February 13, 2017 Type of motion: State’s Second Post-Abatement Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Appellate Brief Party filing motion: Appellee, The State of Texas Document to be filed: Appellee’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: November 18, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: January 13, 2017 Date Requested: March 10, 2017 (112 days from original deadline)

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: March 10, 2017.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ On February 1, 2017, the Clerk of this Court notified the State that an extension motion must be filed within 10 days of that notice if it intended to file a brief. Because the State’s second extension was timely filed and states that, among other things, counsel has been delayed by spending a considerable amount of time with the transition to a new District Attorney this past month, this extension is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d). Accordingly, if the State’s brief is not filed by March 10, 2017, this Court will set this appeal for submission on appellant’s brief only. See id. 38.9(a).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley  Date: February 16, 2017

November 7, 2008 Revision