Milton Parness v. United States
This text of 368 F.2d 327 (Milton Parness v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by a federal prisoner from the denial of his motion, made under section 2255 of title 28, United States Code, to vacate and correct his sentence 1 on the ground that it had been based upon false information contained in a presentence report.
The sentencing judge also heard and denied the present motion. In doing so he expressly found that the assertions challenged as false had not “affected * * * [his] judgment as to the sentence which should be imposed” and that, upon present reconsideration of all relevant and proper information and circumstances, the sentence was appropriate and should stand. 2
These findings are unimpeached. Since the challenged matter played no *328 part in the judge's original determination of an appropriate sentence or in his subsequent reaffirmation of it, the prisoner’s complaint is groundless.
The order appealed from will be affirmed.
. Conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court. 331 F.2d 703, cert. denied 377 U.S. 993, 84 S.Ct. 1919, 12 L.Ed.2d 1045.
. On an earlier motion, the court had reduced the original term of imprisonment from five years to four.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
368 F.2d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-parness-v-united-states-ca3-1967.