Milton Niport v. United States
This text of 263 F.2d 901 (Milton Niport v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the crimes of robbery and carrying a dangerous weapon, 1 and received concurrent sentences.
On this appeal, he urges that the Government failed to prove that the alleged crime was not the product of a mental disease or mental defect. The Government’s testimony on the issue of insanity was offered by a number of lay witnesses and a qualified psychiatrist. On the part of appellant, there was opposing testimony, both lay and psychiatric. The issue was clearly one for the jury, whose verdict was decisive following instructions which we find were proper, fair and adequate.
We have examined the other points raised on the appeal and find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
. Title 22 D.C.Code, §§ 2901 and 3204.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 F.2d 901, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-niport-v-united-states-cadc-1959.